Is this diagram still up to date?
Every questionnaire starts with asking engineers to confirm the architecture diagram still reflects reality.
A customer won't sign until their compliance questionnaire is answered, and the deal stalls while you chase colleagues to find out whether a diagram is still current or which change affected data retention. Now you simply paste the questions from a customer's security questionnaire or compliance report into Comper and get up-to-date answers, architecture diagrams and data-handling details straight from your code.
Every questionnaire starts with asking engineers to confirm the architecture diagram still reflects reality.
Changes land every day, and compliance usually hears about them at the next audit.
Security questionnaires and due-diligence reports want the same facts in a different shape every time.
You wait days for the one engineer who knows how a system handles personal data.
Drop in any questionnaire question and get an answer grounded in your code
Paste the questions from a customer's questionnaire. Comper builds the response, with a current diagram and its sources.
Generated from the code, so they match what's actually running
Architecture diagrams from the whole landscape down to a single system, always in step with the code.
Trace the changes that affect how data is handled, stored or retained
A clear record of what changed, written from what actually merged.
Open CVEs, exposed secrets and health grades across every repository
Health grades, open CVEs and exposed secrets, with the repositories to focus on first.
Who owns each system, and a generated summary of what it does
Every repository gets an owner, a summary and its vital signs, ready to reference in a report.
Paste the questions from a customer's questionnaire. Comper builds the response, with a current diagram and its sources.
Connect a repository and the picture builds itself. Ask a question and get an answer, not a ticket. No tagging, no spreadsheets, no waiting for a board to be updated.
Every figure comes from your commits, pull requests and reviews, not from anyone's status update. When the answer is uncomfortable, it is still the answer.
Your product people, engineers and leadership look at the same view. No translation layer, and no version of the truth that depends on who you asked.
Compliance answers you can stand behind, because they come straight from the code.